On occasion, there is chatter on the cruise boards that indicates that a number of people seem to believe that they are being forced to pay for food on newer ships that have added a large number of “alternative” restaurants.
I believe that while it is true that the number of dining options has increased dramatically, this does not mean that the cruise lines have taken away the free dining choices. They have simply added more choices.
Let’s rewind several years to the late 90’s. Most cruise ships offered first and second seating dinner in one or two main restaurants. There was room service and a buffet (remember the midnight buffet?) and that was pretty much it.

Main Dining Room on Carnival Miracle (Photo Credit: Carnival.com)
Then cruise lines began to introduce alternative restaurants that delivered a higher level of cuisine in more intimate setting and assessed what become known as a “cover charge”. This trend continued to grow until Norwegian Cruise Lines introduced its first Freestyle ship in 2001. Freestyle was the first dining concept to offer a variety of restaurants in multiple locations. The concept of flexible dining times and multiple venues created a bit of a logistics challenge for NCL but over time they were able to work through the issues and guests seemed to embrace this new feature.

Le Bistro French Restaurant On Norwegian Pearl (Photo Credit: NCL.com)
This caused most of the contemporary cruise lines to re-think the traditional dining times and limited number of restaurants. Some like Carnival only offer a few alternative restaurants but added flexible dining times to their programs. On the other hand, the mega ships from Royal Caribbean – Oasis and Allure of the Seas have an astonishing 20 potential dining options (including room service) and 12 require a service charge.
While it might appear that charging for dining is on an upward trend, the reality is that there is little probability that cruising will swing to 100% paid restaurants.
Without the complimentary dining rooms it would be hard to accommodate several thousands of guests in alternative dining venues. The real question is whether the quality of cuisine in the free dining rooms has suffered at the expense of the paid restaurants. My very subjective opinion is that cruise lines investment in complimentary food served onboard has not been cut drastically but neither has it been increased.
Also, the fact that the dining rooms are 2 or 3 times larger than 10 years ago and this in and of itself creates additional challenges. Cruise lines, save for a very few 6 star operators, never promoted their dining as “gourmet”. You just can’t serve a gourmet meal to 2,000 people who arrive within 15 minutes of each other. Cruise line executives tell us that passenger ratings on their main dining rooms has not changed significantly since the introduction of more paid options.
I think that all cruisers should consider alternative dining just that – an alternative. Some people reserve the experience for a special occasion, others go a few times during the week, and some try to experience each alternative venue. But if you choose to simply dine in the main dining rooms each day and avoid specialty restaurant surcharges, this is perfectly fine with the line. The menus are designed for the length of the cruise and you should be able to find something to your liking on each menu.
One trend that has been noticeable is the opening of the buffet restaurants for casual dinner. It’s still as self-serve environment but there are variety of hot entrees, salads and desserts that make a nice alternative to main restaurant offerings.
What do you think about dining on cruises and how often do you visit the specialty restaurants? Let us know in the comments below.
Happy Dining,
Cruise Professor